With 25 years of experience in IT, spanning both technical and leadership roles, Tomasz brings extensive expertise in architecting and delivering Data & Analytics solutions across the CPG, Retail, and Finance industries. His focus includes data management, advanced analytics, AI implementation, and business process automation. Tomasz combines technical knowledge with strategic thinking, technology management experience, and a proven ability to build high-performing delivery teams. As Head of AI Consulting and Advisory at Lingaro, he drives AI business growth, advises clients on AI use cases and adoption strategies, and ensures the successful implementation of AI solutions.

AI (Multi)Agents Decoded: Bridging the Gap Between Business & Tech
5 Critical Questions Every Leadership Team Must Answer
AI's evolution is a story of increasing autonomy. From rule-based systems that followed explicit instructions to machine learning models that found patterns in data, we've now entered the third wave: autonomous agents that reason, plan, and act independently. This shift is changing how businesses operate and compete. The leaders who understand this transformation are asking the right questions about implementation, risks, and strategy. Their questions reveal whether they're ready to lead the AI agent revolution.
From Rules to Reasoning: AI's Path to Autonomy
AI's progression didn't happen overnight. The first wave, spanning the 1950s to early 2000s, gave us knowledge-based systems programmed by human experts. The second wave, from early 2000s to early 2020s, brought machine learning that could identify patterns without explicit programming. Now, the third wave is delivering AI agents that combine reasoning with tool usage and independent action-taking.
The business impact of this AI evolution is already measurable. At Lingaro, we've helped clients harness the cutting edge of GenAI to boost sales by 10%, cut customer response times by 40%, and slash logistics costs by 15%.
Why Questions about AI Agents Matter As Much As Answers
Our clients' successes with AI are milestones on journeys that started somewhere — and always with questions. Our experience helping organizations across industries has taught us that the questions enterprise leaders ask often matter as much as how we address them. These questions reflect strategic thinking, operational concerns, and implementation readiness.
Understanding these patterns helps us — and other enterprise leaders exploring AI agents and multiagent systems — recognize where real challenges lie and how to overcome them.
“AI agent technology maturity is early-stage. Proven standards and frameworks are just beginning to emerge. We have observed that even basic functional and technical definitions of what counts as an AI agent differ between companies. Organizational alignment on several key conceptual decisions is essential for laying a foundation for an agentic ecosystem and its infrastructure.”
Tomasz Rostkowski
DS & AI Practice Director
Below are the five questions we hear most often about this technology. We also explain what these questions reveal about the leaders asking them. Ideally, business and technical leaders will work together to answer these questions. This way, they can both set the right assumptions and expectations for build AI agent architecture that will enable business use cases.
Five Questions Defining AI Agent Journeys
Question 1: What is an agent in a multiagent system?
The Strategic Signal: Leaders asking this question understand that agent architecture decisions will define their entire system's capabilities. It indicates movement from conceptual interest to serious implementation planning, where foundational choices about agent design directly impact business outcomes.
The Operational Reality: These leaders are wrestling with practical decisions about system reliability, scalability, and operating costs. They recognize that their definition of agents determines what their system can accomplish and how well it performs under pressure. This question reveals sophisticated thinking about system design where architecture and capabilities matter more than labels.
Question 2: Are multiagent systems deterministic or probabilistic?
The Strategic Signal: This inquiry cuts straight to risk tolerance and business requirements, revealing leaders who think about regulatory compliance, audit trails, and the balance between reliability and adaptability. This question demonstrates mature strategic thinking about how system behavior affects customer trust and business outcomes.
The Operational Reality: Asking this question are decision-makers from industries where predictability matters — financial services, healthcare, manufacturing — or who are evaluating use cases where consistency is critical. They understand that probabilistic systems offer more flexibility but require different monitoring, testing, and risk management approaches.
Question 3: Are AI agents synchronous or asynchronous?
The Strategic Signal: Behind this technical query lies strategic concern about system resilience and user experience. Leaders asking it are thinking ahead about business continuity, scalability requirements, and how their system will deliver value consistently as demand varies.
The Operational Reality: Askers are often engineering leaders or technically-minded executives who've seen systems fail in production. They understand that communication patterns determine whether a system gracefully handles problems or creates cascading failures that affect business operations.
Question 4: Why do multiagent systems fail and how can this be mitigated?
The Strategic Signal: This question reflects a shift from optimistic "what could go right?" thinking to realistic "what will go wrong?" planning. It reveals leaders who understand that preventing failures protects business value and competitive advantage more effectively than recovering from problems.
The Operational Reality: Leaders with this concern typically have operational experience and know that system failures cost more than prevention measures. They're usually responsible for system reliability, business continuity, or have direct accountability for project success and want to build robust systems rather than impressive demos.
Question 5: Which cloud is best for multiagent systems?
The Strategic Signal: Behind this question is strategic thinking about long-term technology investments, vendor relationships, and total cost of ownership. Leaders asking it understand that cloud choice affects development speed, operational costs, and integration possibilities for years to come.
The Operational Reality: Coming to us with this question are senior technology leaders or executives responsible for enterprise architecture decisions. They understand that multiagent systems don't exist in isolation — they need to work with existing data, applications, and business processes while fitting within current IT governance frameworks.
What Your Questions Reveal About Your Journey
If you're asking these questions, you're already ahead of many organizations. You've moved past the "is this real?" phase and into "how do we do this well?" thinking. You understand that successful AI agent implementation requires more than enthusiasm — it demands careful architectural decisions and realistic planning.
These questions reveal:
- A sophisticated understanding of technology adoption. You're not looking for simple answers because you know the right approach depends on your specific context, existing systems, and business requirements.
- The mindset of successful early adopters. The organizations seeing real business value from AI agents asked similar questions before building systems that actually work in production. They understood that getting the fundamentals right matters more than moving fast.
- Operational maturity. Your focus on system design and failure modes shows you're planning for success rather than just hoping for it.
The Patterns in Your Strategic Thinking
Across these questions, several themes emerge that distinguish leaders ready for AI agent success:
- Architecture awareness. Whether asking about agent definitions, communication patterns, or failure modes, you're thinking about how early design decisions affect long-term system behavior and business outcomes.
- Risk management mindset. Your questions about deterministic vs. probabilistic behavior and failure mitigation show you're balancing innovation with reliability. You want to capture opportunities without creating new operational problems.
- Integration consciousness. Questions about cloud platforms and system architecture reveal awareness that AI agents must work within existing technology ecosystems and business processes, not replace them entirely.
- Operational realism. Your focus on failure modes and system behavior shows you're planning for production deployment with real users and business impact, not just proof-of-concept demonstrations.
What Comes Next
The questions you're asking are the right ones. They demonstrate readiness for serious AI agent implementation and understanding of what separates successful deployments from expensive experiments.
But questions without answers don't move projects forward. These questions revolve around important technical decisions to be made — how to structure agent communication, balance predictability with adaptability, design for resilience, and choose the right technology foundation. These decisions will determine whether your AI agent initiative delivers business value or becomes another pilot that never scales.
The answers exist, but they're not one-size-fits-all. Each organization's optimal approach depends on their risk tolerance, existing technology investments, team capabilities, and business requirements. Leaders succeeding with AI agents aren't finding universal answers — they're making informed decisions based on clear understanding of trade-offs and implications.
Your thoughtful questions deserve equally thoughtful responses.
Our guide provides the answers you need to move forward.